Reassuring words for an autumn vote in Ireland?

Posted by Michael Berendt on 10/12/08

“The way forward is beginning to emerge”. So said Dick Roche,  Ireland’s minister for European affairs, on the eve of the Brussels December summit. It looks like a second Irish referendum for the autumn of 2009.

The Irish Taoiseach Brian Cowen is expected to tell EU colleagues that he will seek a second referendum in the autumn as long as some reassuring protocols can be agreed. These would deal with taxation (where corporate rates have been such a key factor in boosting inward investment), abortion (EU keep out!) and defence (no threat for Irish neutrality).

Putting a fence around Irish taxes may not go down well with those member states which dislike low corporate tax regimes, but reflects the realities of EU policy. On abortion and defence there should be no problem.

The Irish government will also call for the scrapping of Article 17 (5) of the Lisbon EU draft treaty which would reduce the number of commissioners by one third as from 2014, but I see that the Article itself provides that it can be changed by unanimity. My sympathies are with the Irish on Article 17. The Union is distant enough from the citizen as it is. One commissioner per country will certainly be unwieldy in an EU of 30 or more members, but is a price worth paying for smaller states to have someone of their own to engage with in Brussels.

Of course none of this will guarantee an Irish “yes”, but the tide of opinion may well have turned. Ireland has punched well above its economic weight as a financial services centre over the last 30 years, but faced with the credit crunch it is only the country’s eurozone membership and ECB support which have staved off an Icelandic-style financial disaster. The people have taken note.

The credit crisis has transformed the political and economic landscape for everyone. Denmark is now looking increasingly likely to hold its own referendum on adopting the euro to stabilise its economic position. And now we have Iceland desperate to join the EU and the eurozone to rebuild its economy.

So can the UK be far behind? Yes, far behind. Unless, that is, the global economic turbulence gets worse and the Bank of England no longer has adequate resources to bail out the financial services sector. I liked President Barroso’s provocative remarks noting the growing British interest in the euro, especially given his regular meetings with Gordon Brown and the curious spectacle of Sarkozy, Brown and Barroso all getting together in 10 Downing Street to praise each other’s expansionist policies and say, poker-faced, that they had no doubt Germany would join in. Chancellor Merkel is not so convinced.

As well as the Irish question and the financial crisis, EU leaders will be looking at some new dimensions in European defence policy. In one week we have seen the establishment of a naval task force to combat Somali pirates in the Gulf of Aden and the transfer of policing powers in Kosovo from the United Nations to an EU police and justice mission. The European Security and Defence Policy seems to be evolving nicely, with or without Lisbon.

One Response to Reassuring words for an autumn vote in Ireland? »»

  1. Comment by Tore Toivicco | 2009/02/01 at 00:11:43

    Message to irish people about Lisbon treaty:

    Lisbon treaty seems to be totally strange and deleting democracy or human rights?

    http://conservativehome.blogs.com/centreright/2008/01/lisbon-treaty-c.html

    I’ve read an article which states that police gets rights to shoot people in some situations.

    These kind of things are totalitarian politics.

    It also propably stops right to go on strike.

    http://www.no2lisbon.ie/en/press-centre/entry/160

    And all this in whole Europe…

    It is sad to notice that all other countries have accepted this treaty, but many governments have not even given people chance to vote about it.

    Irish government has given you this right,…anyway it is really strange that Ireland maybe votes again about this, and only after few months?(or 2009?)

    EU elite needs this YES, and they have ordered new voting?

    If this is true it shows how horrible secret elite rules EU, and what can we expect from the future?
    Lisbon treaty is basicly giving ‘Gestapo’-laws to EU-government, if needed?

    And they seem to need those laws fast?

    Vote NO, and save the world?

    F.ex. in many european countries media and politicians has almost 100% ignored discussions about this subject, and people are not even aware about whole thing?

    It is also good to remember that USA has now similar ‘mertial laws’ there, after 11th september 2001… ?

    EU security officials decide about all security matters of whole EU?

    Also there is some things which makes it very difficult for normal people to complain and get things corrected if there is wrongful handlings?

    I hope I am wrong, but this whole thing , and how it has been handled seems really wrong? And it is not a democratic way to handle politics.?

    http://www.europeanfoundation.org/docs/Treaty%20of%20Lisbon.htm

    ps.

    I am harassed so much all the time that this writing may include errors.

    -Tore Toivicco


Leave a Reply »»

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image

Michael Berendt’s blog rss

Blogging commentary on current events from the perspective of someone who has been closely involved with the policies, the policy-makers and the whole complex network of people who make the process of European integration so exciting and absorbing. more.



Advertisement